![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiyVTPWvctYF0Ji1s6n1tnWwlry3dzm8Q4VwrIYHlxpOsm3FRt3xDtxuVK0dJkg11mSK_gGQdNONyaaS4Cpa3h-v3M-asrMCgf_kUdfDc-LaDCyN_wLWNESM5VrsrK8Q4XNmmp6/s400/Jerk+1.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhWqWwoRHjubRbdijDYtfGWD5rO22PLVdfrtmgcd3BcHGuU8KqvOcTsbECzGlNdrUW7pr_uRgx7mIZeHO-qsvVn2nmPnpwmv0Qabibc9HSMPgvXW8BCsnpnUMfLMz8pkVfjDKXc/s400/Eerie+3.jpg)
As we were watching, there was a sequence where Navin (Steve Martin) was describing his new mansion complete with the artwork. One of the pieces looked suspiciously like a painting by Frank Frazetta. Now it is not certain whether the painting in "The Jerk" is indeed a Frazetta, but it is definitely inspired by the cover painting that was by Frazetta used on the cover of "Eerie" #3.
Here is a screen capture from "The Jerk" and then here is the cover to "Eerie". Let me know what you think....is this a Frazetta original or a distinct rip-off?
1 comment:
Just been watching it and googled the image, found your blog. It looks like a rip off, perhaps by the same production artist who did the other paintings in the film. In my opinion, that scene would have been far more amusing with a giant version of the Eerie cover, skulls and monster included.
Post a Comment